AI has been something that everyone has been trying to get their heads around for some time, with continuing debate about if and how the screen industries may use it going forward. Mello posits that it could be an “incredible tooling” device, Murphy is focused on the legislative issues that still need to be worked out, whilst Jones states: “I wouldn’t use it in any part of the creative process”.
Mello says: “From an early iteration perspective, and in terms of prototyping, I think there is something interesting there. When you’re on paper it’s incredibly difficult to communicate the vision, so this can be useful for indies talking to larger IP holders… AI can help mock up a concept, facilitate a visualisation or some sort of representation of that experience. I think that’s really powerful and could unlock opportunities for indies…
“We’re still finding our way, but I think it’s dangerous to write it off as ‘bad’. There are so many areas in which it can super charge creativity.”
Murphy thinks we should be focusing on gaining more of “a legal certainty” around how to use it and who owns it. He says: “Because people are experimenting all the time, or they’re unsure of how to use it, and actually what comes out the other side whether they might be infringing or who owns that copyright. But also [we need to consider] how artists and others are compensated for their work properly and their work is protected and that’s still ongoing.”
And for Jones its most important that whatever happens we ensure we protect creativity. She says: “It seems counterintuitive to creativity in general and I’ve not really found any use for it. It’s good to be aware of what’s going on and to try things and as a tool for things like maybe brainstorming things or what layout should I have my pitch deck using it as a better search engine its fairly useful for that. I don’t use it for generating art, I won’t use it on the voice assets nothing like that. There’s no benefit to me to do that and I value my creatives so I wouldn’t ever want them to feel like that’s a replacement.
“I don’t think it’s going to improve anything in the content that we’re putting out and we’re not representing human stories anymore, we’re representing what already exists… if we want to make culturally significant creative products there’s no real place for it for me.”